HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY ASSURANCE: FINLAND’S EXPERIENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.2.15

Keywords:

accreditation, effectiveness and quality of assessment, evaluation groups, external evaluation, internal evaluation, quality assurance of education

Abstract

The article discusses the main approaches to quality assurance in higher education in Finland. The relevance of studying the experience for Ukraine is determined. Quality assurance in higher education is governed by the legal framework of the country. External evaluation is carried out by the Finnish Education Evaluation Center (FINEEC). The objectives of the FINEEC are: evaluation of education, teaching, teachers and activities of higher education institutions; development of educational evaluation; evaluation of the results of training in basic education, higher secondary education and training, basic education in the arts. Finnish higher education institutions are primarily responsible for the quality of education.
Self-esteem is accomplished through a digital platform. Program accreditation aims to increase international recognition.
The author notes that Higher Education Institutions are actively involved in external evaluations. The quality assurance mechanism of education is constantly being improved. The results of the external evaluation are used as a benchmark for internal evaluation. Higher education institutions select a national or international team to audit.
Particular attention is paid to the accreditation of programs. The analysis of the quality assurance system of higher education gives grounds to claim that it is an effective organization, which provides the necessary resources (academic and administrative staff, students, scientific and administrative leaders, financial, material, information, scientific, educational resources, etc.); effective activity of relevant bodies that ensure the quality of higher education of the country; designation of audit teams; identifying audit objectives; undergoing appropriate procedure; defining clear evaluation criteria that demonstrate the effectiveness and quality of the evaluation. The outlined approaches and methods of quality assurance of education serve as an example of imitation for quality assurance of higher education of Ukraine and a guideline for its development.

Author Biography

Svitlana Zaskaleta, Mykolaiv V. O. Sukhomlynskyi National University, 24 Nikolska Str., 54030 Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Pedagogy, Professor of English Language and Literature Department

References

Finland. Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2019). https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/ finland/quality-assurance-higher-education_en.

Kajaste, M.; Prades, A.; Scheuthle, H. (2015). Impact evaluation from quality assurance agencies’ perspectives: methodological approaches, experiences and expectations. Quality in higher education, 21 ( 3), 270287. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2015.1111006

Lynova, I. (2019). PhD Education Quality Evaluation: Experience of Universities of Lithuania and Finland).

Neperervna profesiina osvita: teoriia i praktyka, 3, 8287. http://dx.doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.3.8287.

Manatos, M. J.; Huisman, J. (2020). The use of the European Standards and Guidelines by national accreditation agencies and local review panels. Quality in higher education, 26 (1), 4865. 10.1080/13538322.2020.1728835.

Ognevyuk, V., & Sysoieva, S. (2015). Training of educational experts in Ukraine: experimental interdisciplinary program. The advanced science journal, 6, 98–103. 10.15550/ASJ.2015.06.098.

Organization of the Education System and of its Structure (2020). https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/ eurydice/finland/organisation-education-system-and-its-structure_en.

Overberg, J.; Ala-Vahala, T. (2019). Everlasting Friends and Enemies? Finnish University Personnel’s Perceptions of Internal Quality Assurance in 2010 and 2017. Scandinavian journal of educational research. 10.1080/00313831.2019.1596977

Overberg, J., Lehmkuhl, P., Schütz, M., Röbken, H. (2020). (Re)-reforming external quality assurance in higher education–the Finnish case. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.171 8519.

Volynets, L. (2013). Pryntsypy osvitnoi polityky Finliandii shchodo zabezpechennia yakosti zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Principles of Finland’s educational policy to ensure the quality of general secondary education]. Porivnialno-pedahohichni studii, 1 (15), 6975.

Zhernoklieiev, I., Pushkarova, T. (2006). Systema osvity Finliandii: dosvid i zdobutky [Finland’s educational system: experience and achievements]. Pidruchnyk dlia Dyrektora: Zhurnal upravlinskoi kompetentnosti, 3, 548. https:// osvita.ua/school/method/1300/.

Kotun, K. V. (2014). Pedahohichna osvita Finliandii u konteksti yevropeiskoho vymiru [Pedagogical education in Finland in the context of the European dimension]. Instytut obdarovanoi dytyny.

Ohneviuk, V., Sysoieva, S (2015). Pidhotovka ekspertiv u haluzi osvity v Ukraini [Training of educational experts in Ukraine]. Osvitolohiia, 4, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2015.4.5460.

Osoblyvosti systemy osvity Finliandii [Features of the educational system of Finland] (2017). https://pon.org.ua/ novyny/5682-osoblivost-sistemi-osvti-fnlyandyi.html.

Ponomarenko, N. H. (2015). Ekspertna diialnist u vyshchii osviti Nimechchyny [Higher Education Evaluation in Germany]. Neperervna profesiina osvita: teoriia i praktyka, 4, 60–63. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2015.4.6063.

Tryhub, I. (2019). Pidhotovka ekspertiv u haluzi osvity: dosvid Skhidnoi Yevropy [The experience of training experts in the field of education in Eastern Euorope]. Neperervna profesiinv osvita: teoriia i praktyka, 1, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2019.1.8892.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Zaskaleta, S. (2020). HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY ASSURANCE: FINLAND’S EXPERIENCE. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.2.15

Issue

Section

QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND ITS EXPERT SUPPORT: THE EU EXPERIENCE